NHL TV Partners Need to Help Explain Player Tragedies

I’ve mostly stayed away from this sort of thing as it has reared its ugly head twice before over the summer. Yet, here the hockey world is again, in the wake of a tragedy. This time, it is Wade Belak, who took his own life at the age of 35 in Toronto yesterday. This is third death of an NHL player, and the second suicide of an NHL player (the first one was of a drug overdose), within a few months. To not have it weigh heavy on your mind would be impossible as someone who watches as much hockey as I do, and as I imagine anyone who reads my website would have to as well.

It is a horrible, incomprehensible tragedy that Belak, as well as Rick Rypien and Derek Boogaard, are gone forever. Other men have spoken about the range of emotions that you have to feel for these players, these human beings, and their families. Greg Wyshynski and Bruce Arthur both wrote words that have touched me and spoke to how I felt about all of this. I am truly at a loss for them, other than to say that my heart is truly in pieces for the families and – in Belak’s most tragic case – young children who will have to carry on in the wake of these men. I cannot even venture to guess how lost they must feel from all this, and how much they have lost.

We all must move on, however, after a few more days in which we will see more tributes to Belak, more words spent recapping the terrible loss that the hockey family has burdened since May, when Boogaard died, and that continued a few weeks ago, when Rypien took his life. Even more will be spent talking about the cause and effect of fighting in the game, how it may have affected the mental state of these men and what they have done. About the punishing sort of game that these three men in particular personified. That’s not what I’m here to talk about at all, however. What this is about is sending a message, publicly, through the league’s easiest connection to its’ fans.

The National Hockey League’s television partners in both the United States and Canada, have a real opportunity here. They have a chance to spark real debate about issues such as head injuries, hitting, fighting, how players should be properly medicated, drug culture, and in the NHLPA’s case, how their athletes transition into life after hockey. Issues such as these should already be regularly bantered about on the numerous chat segments of Hockey Night in Canada and TSN’s panel, but there needs to be expanded debate.

These are just a few of the many issues that need to be – if not debated – at least talked about on CBC, TSN and VERSUS in America. One could forgive the NHL’s own in-house channel from sidestepping this, but NHL Network could be involved in creating debate too, in the vein of the two-hour special the network aired that dealt with race in the modern game. This isn’t something that VERSUS can ignore either. Maybe they will, but they shouldn’t. You’ve got a 10-year contract with the league, now’s the time to discuss some of the more dicey issues and bring something like this to the forefront. Talk to the hardcore hockey fan like adults. We’ve all just been dealt a horrifying summer in which three players died of means that could have prevented. How many more of these do we need to see without more than a brief obituary?

My suggestion is as follows. CBC or TSN, in conjunction with VERSUS or the NHL Network in the states, should hold a two-hour (or one-hour, to accommodate TV) roundtable discussion on these issues – formatted similarly to the one on race from a couple of years ago – that gets out a a message that these topics won’t be swept under the rug for another season. Involve people from the league, commentators, players, medical experts, whomever. Just get into an open, frank talk about what’s happened over the summer and what can be done to turn this around.

It isn’t just that these are hockey players. These are men with a unique influence on fans of this game, especially young children. Whether we like it or not, one of the appeals of hockey to young fans is that players are allowed to spontaneously fight each other. Some kids have lost their heroes this summer, even aside from the obvious tragic loss to their families. Enforcers, or “goons,” hold a special place in many fans’ hearts. How do we deal with the fact that three of them have died, that two have taken their own lives? Television, at it’s very best, can help us steer the conversation towards making real change.

14 Responses to NHL TV Partners Need to Help Explain Player Tragedies

  1. kevin says:

    Honestly I wouldn’t worry about it….these guy are goons that don’t belong in the game. The dead guys are basically borderline lowlifes who made some decent money in hockey and decided to spend it on drugs. Maybe Canada should take a look at their wonderful “society”….

  2. I agree Steve, Something really needs to be done to address this situation. Maybe a start is on these shows that NBCSportsVersus are going to start is a good place, then lead into something that goes into depth.

  3. Phil Viveiros says:

    Another thought, Steve – each of the NHL’s TV partners in the US and Canada have sister news operations (CBC News, CTV News, and NBC News/MSNBC). Those resources can/should be used for thoughtful journalism on the issue to both a hockey audience and to the non-hockey/casual sports fan. Whether reporters on the news side contribute to hockey-related programmning on CBC, TSN, or Versus, or vice-versa, there is potential to really bring a thoughtful discussion on these tragedies and their underlying causes to the forefront.

    Great post – hope it sparks wider debate in the blogosphere.

    • Ryan says:

      That’s one option, but even the sports networks have their own personnel who can handle news. Look at Michael Landsberg in his pre-glory hog days covering the Dubin Inquiry. Rod Black broke the news of 9/11 to anyone watching CTV. James Duthie, Brian Williams, and Dave Hodge could all easily be seen as credible voices on this issue. And that’s just for TSN.

  4. Arthur says:

    What intrigues me most about your post is that, once again, you implore other forms of media (the NHL’s TV partners) to hold roundtable discussions while you “mostly stayed away from this sort of thing.” Why don’t you ever state your opinions on these topics instead of just saying we have to have meaningful talks on all these “dicey issues?” Are blogs such as yours not worthy of generating a broad message to the NHL and it’s players and fans?
    The only meaningful conversations about all of the above topics you mentioned will come between the NHL and the NHLPA and how they determine the direction the game takes. They are the ones who legislate the rules. I am in favor of eliminating fighting from hockey. Are you Steve? Start the discussion right here and right now.

  5. Mike in Idaho says:

    They should eliminate the 4th line, 10-20 games from the regular season and 5 teams. The result would be a much better quality product.

  6. kevin says:

    Just get rid of goons…a guy that plays 5 minutes per nite is a joke. These guys had problems but it has little to do with hockey. One guy was a drug addict. The other guy was chronically depressed…and who knows with this guy. He wasn’t even playing hockey anymore so how is it a hockey problem? I would look at societal issues i.e. in CANADA.

  7. kevin says:

    The fact is Canada has a screwed up system. Taking kids away from their homes at 13-14 to play junior hockey isn’t a great idea. It’s too easy to start bad habits at that age without parents around……….

    • Arthur says:

      it happens here in the States too so please does us all a favor and shut up

    • Ryan says:

      Not that arguing with you has done anything but make your comments even more bizarre, but this summer’s three suicides include a player who played five games of junior hockey at 17 and none before (Boogaard), a player who played one game of junior hockey at 17 and none before (Rypien), and a player who played junior for his hometown team and was in the AHL before he was based outside his hometown (Belak).

      So not a single one of these cases can be remotely connected to being taken away from home at 14, 15, 16, or even really 17 even though plenty of people start college at that age.

  8. Patrick says:

    We here at puckmedia want clean fun vanilla topics and do not like to get our skirt dirty. Wed rather others do that. We like to create ideas and accept ownership of such idea if taken.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: