The Happy Recap: Among Fans, Not Media, is Where Enthusiasm Matters
December 15, 2008 3 Comments
We received a comment on the enthusiasm gap post we made today, from a guy named Gary:
The Devils have been very successful over the past 15 years (to a much greater degree than the Nets have been) but the New York media doesn’t give them as much coverage as the Rangers – so I think that helps build the rivalry. The Devils have to fight for more coverage, while the Rangers have extensive media coverage by default. The same thing happens to the Nets, but for the Devils it seems a bit more pathetic (because of the lack of acknowledgment of their 3 cups in the past 15 years)
If the Nets had as much success as the Devils, the Knicks/Nets rivalry would be much more intense. I’m not a big basketball fan, and the Rangers/Devils rivalry is much more storied – but I think a lot of the passion is due to the less popular team having playoff success. And the Rangers organization was struggling, but they always held the upper hand on the ice over the Devils.
I’m a Ranger fan, and have a bunch of friends that are Devil fans, and we all agree that even though the Devils won 3 cups – no one seems to care in the media.
While Gary’s point has some truth to it, I don’t think “The Enthusiasm Gap” was ever about the media’s coverage of the two sports. Obviously, there is an enthusiasm gap between hockey and hoops – among our nation’s sports editors. But this a purely fan-base based argument. When it comes to fans, the Devils have more loyal ones. Obviously, that comes from winning for so many years, which also breeds apathy. But the new arena has made the Devils fans a lot more passionate about their team, while the Nets fans remain dormant in the old barn.
Your Responses