Radical Realignment Could Boost Local, National Television Numbers for NHL

The Dallas Stars currently play 20 games a year (at Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Jose and Anaheim in division, and at Colorado, Vancouver, Calgary and Colorado in the Northwest) in which start times could easily be at latest 9:30 p.m. central time. That’s one full quarter of your schedule beginning after young children – the people you want to sink your marketing claws into and make devotees for life in a difficult, football dominated market – have gone to sleep, with little care as to what the local hockey team is doing.

If the radical realignment proposed by commissioner Gary Bettman goes through, that would conceivably drop the number of games starting after 9 p.m. CT to eight per season, which would be the same as every other team that plays in the central and eastern time zones. Really, there’s no reason that this shouldn’t go through, beyond the shortsidedness and greed of some eastern owners. In the end, it is good for the game on television, a medium that is paying the league $2 billion over the next year, not counting the hundreds of millions being made off of regional television contracts. It’s also good for revenues. The Florida teams get more snowbird audiences, while Carolina and Washington get a heaping dose of New York and Philly transplants, while everyone else stays with their rivals. Money should do the talking here.

Here’s the screenshot via Puck Daddy of what the NHL could look like next year:

All of those divisions look pretty nasty to me. From my perspective, here’s my only real problem with what’s been proposed. Divisional playoffs would return, meaning the top four teams from each division – which, to me, is unfair. Make it the top three, and then the next best four teams are wild cards assigned to conference winners based on record. Also, make sure you don’t name the new conferences based on geography, we wouldn’t want an MLS-esque problem of having a team from New York win the Western Conference (Seriously, that happened) – would make the playoffs. This means that the Penguins and Capitals, Red Wings and Blackhawks, Flames and Oilers, Rangers and Devils, Flyers and Penguins can never meet in a conference final. Worth thinking about a Stanley Cup Playoffs that would never feature Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin in the final four together.

Otherwise, here’s what I like about realignment:

  • The re-seeded Final Four. The NHL would re-seed the four conference winners, 1-4 and 2-3. It’d likely mean one less banner to hang up (or one more, considering you’d have four conference champions) and the end of the Prince of Wales Trophy and the Campbell Bowl, but who really cares about those? You’d reward the best regular season teams even further by ensuring they get the (conceivably) most advantageous conference final match-up. Sure, you’d have some stinker final fours each year, but you could potentially one day see a Pittsburgh-Detroit, Toronto-Vancouver Final Four, appeasing networks both above and below the border to no end.
  • National Television schedules improve. The NHL has already made it so that all the Canadian teams play each other twice a year, but the new schedules would mean CBC and TSN could divvy up two visits to Toronto and Montreal per year from Detroit, Pittsburgh, New York and Chicago, while giving extra meaning to those always highly-rated all-Canadian match-ups. For VERSUS/NBCSN/NBC, the regular season battles between the Rangers and Flyers and Blackhawks and Red Wings and Penguins and Caps now mean even more with the knowledge that they’re likely going to have to get through each other in the post-season. The NHL has been trying to convince casual fans for years that the regular season matters. Divisional playoffs will help.
  • The obvious help for local TV ratings out West. A rivals-heavy schedule, plus two games against everyone else, will only help the teams in non-traditional markets and out West. The LA Kings get to promote six match-ups with cross-town rival Anaheim, plus two games against Pittsburgh and Washington each. So does every other team. These are the games that both local fans and transplants tune into. Sure, they’ll also see Detroit two fewer times on the schedule, but it’s certainly worth it to get Toronto, New York, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Washington twice instead of once, which is the case in most years.
  • A “simple” Detroit to the East swap would decimate Western TV exposure. If you put the Red Wings in the East in a trade for Winnipeg, you take 8-10 national television appearances away from Western Conference teams that are already precious few. During the regular season, the NHL On NBC hasn’t aired a game of a team west of Minnesota since 2008. They haven’t aired a game from a team west of Dallas since 2007. Putting Detroit in the East just further isolates those teams from big-time exposure, and continues the knock on the NHL and it’s television partners for only promoting it as an east coast league.

There are a lot of reasons to stick with the status quo, but to me, the benefits of giving every team an even playing field in terms of television ratings and attendance makes too much sense. Plus, the Stanley Cup Playoffs – the greatest sports tournament on earth – would become even more intense, with match-ups guaranteed to be built on rivalries fought and bled for in the regular season. The sense I get from people seems to be that Commissioner Bettman will push this through. I hope he does.

About these ads

About Steve Lepore
Contact me at stevemlepore@gmail.com

12 Responses to Radical Realignment Could Boost Local, National Television Numbers for NHL

  1. Ryan says:

    I’m really loving this realignment plan. Hopefully they go back to the old Smythe/Patrick/Norris/Adams names too — not hard at all to more or less match each of these conferences up with a more “classic” division.

  2. Sean says:

    I LOVE the radical realignment. And I love the old-school hockey playoffs of top 4 within conferences.

    The NHL should just move Phoenix to Kansas City now and swap Winnipeg & KC in the conferences. Other than that, it’s perfect.

    As for Crosby/Ovechkin not meeting in the Cup finals….a minor problem. If anything, it increases the possibility of playoff matchups between them & that’s good for ratings. Look at baseball…no matter what round of the playoffs Yanks/Red Sox happens, it’s ratings gold.

    I always thought a simple Detroit swap to the East was the absolute WORST scenario for, as you laid out, the West would become a wasteland.

  3. Matt says:

    If the NHL goes for this proposal, here’s hoping that the Smythe, Patrick, Norris and Adams division names along with the Prince of Wales & Clarence Campbell Conference names are restored. Hell, even bring back the old NHL logo that was in use before the lockout was over.

    Crosby and Ovechkin should not meet in the Stanley Cup Finals. To have two teams from the same conference meet in the Stanley Cup Finals is just wrong.

    As far as Detroit moving to the Eastern Conference, I don’t think that it would necessarily be a bad thing. Although it would give NBC an excuse not to cover Western Conference teams outside of Chicago… maybe the NHL can mandate that NBC must cover more Western Conference teams (other than Chicago & Minnesota) going forward should the Red Wings move to the Eastern Conference.

  4. Eddie says:

    Though, it might not happen often. It would take out the chance for a original six final. With taking Detroit to the East. Detroit just strengthens the west perfect balance.

  5. WhitehorseJosh says:

    The NHL has already made it so that all the Canadian teams play each other twice a year, but the new schedules would mean CBC and TSN could divvy up two visits to Toronto and Montreal per year from Detroit, Pittsburgh, New York and Chicago, while giving extra meaning to those always highly-rated all-Canadian match-ups.

    Would it mean that? My understanding is that under this plan, teams would play home-and-home with everyone outside their conference/division only once. Meaning, because Montreal and Toronto are not in the same conference/division as either Detroit or Pittsburgh, they would only see those teams once per year at home. Many Eastern teams such as Pittsburgh, Philly, Washington and the Rangers would now only visit Montreal, Ottawa and Toronto once per year – fewer games than they currently play in those cities.

    I think you might be misunderstanding something, Steve.

  6. Sean says:

    NHL network did a poor job of the breaking news on alignment …so much so that ej said bettman was in a press conference. So where the crap was the NHL network, outside!

  7. Eddie says:

    Gary did say that after the first two rounds. It isn’t a guarantee, that they will re-configured 1-4 for the conference winners. That he plans on talking to the GM later down the line. I hope they go through with it. It would really make it interesting, but will see.

  8. tlas says:

    Well, the deed has been done. Now waiting to see whether the players accept the proposal. 3rd round of playoffs format haven’t been decided yet.

  9. kevin says:

    What happens when Phoenix goes to Quebec City? Shouldn’t they have waited another year before doing this? Looks like the Islanders will never make the playoffs ever again. Also, this will guarantee some bad teams make the playoffs ever year

    • Eddie says:

      That is true about the bad teams getting in, but I think they’ll give it a test run next year and then if that’s the case. They can always stay with the realignment and stick with the playoff format they have now. Rank the 1 and 2 from each conference and the the top 6 teams from conference A/B make in. There are some flaws, but I love this concept. The schedule is balanced. Travel is more balanced for teams. Way more pros than cons. They can always tinker with it later.

  10. nationscapital says:

    I think that they should stay with the playoff format that they have now going forward.

    @ kevin,

    If Phoenix moves to Quebec City, then the team would be slotted in the Northeast Conference or whatever it’s called in the future. No further switching has to be done. Now if Phoenix moves to Kansas City, either they or another team in the Midwest Conference will have to be moved to either the Northeast or Atlantic Conference. This could really mess things up if PHX moves to KC.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers

%d bloggers like this: