Let’s All Say It Together: Hotstove Isn’t Any Fun to Watch Anymore

It was always an often pseudo-belief of mine that American hockey fans are oddly drawn to Hockey Night in Canada due to it’s fantastic presentation of the sport, legendary voices, and the idea that a 70-year old white man will rant about a sport played by 20-and 30-year olds in jingoistic, barely coherent fashion.  There is a natural curiosity in all of us about Canada’s weekly hockey showcase, and it’s driven by the variety the show gives you.  It’s not just idiots barking at a desk.

The closest Hockey Night used to get to guys talking at a desk was the Satellite Hotstove segment.  It used to be composed of three well-connected, occasionally controversial writers discussing trade rumors and finances of the game type stuff.  On the surface, it could seem like something to take a snack break on.  But I’ve often felt that many American viewers (and younger Canadian viewers) show up for Hockey Night for Don Cherry, but stay because of Hotstove.  It was a genuinely good natured, and occasionally highly informative segment.

However, things started to go bad last season, when Mike Milbury was hired to be a part of the regular panel.  Not only would Mad Mike’s status as a non-writer take away a spot from a more well-reasoned person like Scott Morrisonn or others of the ilk… c’mon, it’s Mike freaking Milbury!  What other reason do you need to dislike this move?

Milbury, instead of using his connections as a long-termed GM to try and bring a new perspective on Hotstove’s rumors and relocation talk format, has instead used it as his own personal bully pulpit.  However, it was always usually as defensable as harmless, jingoistic idiocy up until now (Remember how much of a non-story “pansification” ended up being?).

However, Hotstove has taken an extreme turn for the worse.  In the past two weeks, the third member of the panel (Besides Milbury and the typically levelheaded and intelligent Pierre LeBrun) has been Ian Pulver.  During the NHLPA’s Goodenow administration, Pulver was an associate council to the PA.  He also runs Pulver Sports Agency.  Oh, hey, an agent who worked under Goodenow, during the period in which players gave NHL GM’s migraines with their increased salary demands.  Hey, Mike Milbury was a GM during that period.  Oh, boy, I bet he sure doesn’t care for Ian Pulver.

By watching that video clip, you all know the rest.  The last two weeks of Hotstove have been akin to torture porn movies.  It’s been endless bickering.  Pulver, who I’m sure is a smart, savvy businessman – comes across as a bumbler and a comic foil to Milbury’s bullying, even more than Al Strachan did before he was fired.  While Pulver mostly let Mad Mike beat him up the week before, he was firing back this time.  Honestly, it was hard to tell what they were arguing about at a certain point.

Hotstove is clearly lost.  I hope other writers pick up this cause, because something needs to be done about this segment.  If you want to have Mike Milbury analyze hockey games and do studio work, that’s fine.  But if he’s being groomed into the Don Cherry role, do not give him a punching bag that will lead to more shrill, whiny, jingoistic yelling.  It’s ruining the classic allure of Hockey Night.  It’s supposed to be hockey coverage with something different thrown in at every break.  Now, it’s just old men yelling at me, and I don’t like it one bit.

About these ads

About stevelepore
Steve Lepore is the Managing Editor of Puck the Media. His work has been featured in The Hockey News. Feel free to contact him at stevemlepore@gmail.com

6 Responses to Let’s All Say It Together: Hotstove Isn’t Any Fun to Watch Anymore

  1. Shane Kramps says:

    I couldn’t agree more with this article. I PVR the hotstove each week just so I don’t miss it. The last two weeks have been atrocious. Bring back Strachan – if that bridge is too thoroughly charred then at least bring in Eric Duhatschek, or someone that can offer insights that the fans that don’t live in the hockey world can’t otherwise get. Ian Pulver seems nervous, and unwilling to discuss options for improvement, and has so far offered no insight. The hotstove is indeed lost without a compass.

  2. Colton says:

    Ian Pulver is a beginner in the tv world. Give the guy some time to adapt.

    Milbury should never leave the show. He brings some fire and energy to the show.

    LeBrun can do the inside information.

    It’s more entertaining without Strachan’s bizarre trade rumours and the such.

  3. Josh says:

    Milbury inhibits people. If you don’t agree with him, he’s unwilling to hear what you have to say. I understand that they need an old-guard guy on the panel, but Milbury creates an environment where people don’t want to speak and can’t make their points.

    We already have one of those guys on during the first intermission – we don’t need a second.

  4. Fultron says:

    “…instead of using his connections as a long-termed GM…”
    Yeah, and one of the worst GM’s of the modern era at that. I can’t take any of Milbury’s insights seriously, knowing how things went on Long Island. I don’t know who he still talks to, but he somehow seems to have absolutely no relevent insider knowledge about anything currently happening in the league. He’s under contract with the CBC until the end of this season, so unfortunately there’s no way they’re rotating him out of the Hotstove any time soon.

    Lebrun is very good, and so was Duhatschek. Strach was alright, but it was a big mistake firing him. The last two weeks with Milbury and Pulver have been horrible and pointless. The look on MacLean and Lebrun’s faces in the freeze-frame of above clip says it all.

  5. islander says:

    Milbury turned Hrudey – once an engaging analyst – into a shell of his former self.
    For that alone, he needs to be sent back to the barking panel on TSN.

  6. B's fan says:

    Agreed agreed agreed agreed. Pulver’s been a catastrophe on Hotstove, which has historically been one of the best few minutes of hockey discussion around. This is far more about his bumbling incompetence and lack of helpful insight than about Milbury’s bullying nature, and I could not agree more that he should be cast off as soon as contractually possible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers

%d bloggers like this: